Every Picture Is a Compromise
Lessons from the Also-rans
Most photography websites show the photographer's very best work. Wonderful. But that's not the full story of a creative life. If we want to learn, we'd better pay attention to the images that aren't "greatest hits" and see what lessons they have to offer. Every picture is a compromise — the sum of its parts, optical, technical, visual, emotional, and even cosmic – well, maybe not cosmic, but sometimes spiritual. Success on all fronts is rare. It's ok to learn from those that are not our best.
This is a series about my also-rans, some of which I've been able to improve at bit (i.e., "best effort"), none of which I would consider my best. With each there are lessons worth sharing, so I will.
Previous image | Next image |
Original digital capture
Empty Centers Week
Resisting "bull's eye" composition.
This week (again at the request of readers), I'll discuss images that avoid centering the subject in the middle of the frame — so-called "bull's eye" composition.
What I saw that I liked:
Floating leaf on a scummy puddle.
What I don't like in the picture:
The one above was my first and knee-jerk reaction to this scene. When what you like is a "floating leaf on a scummy puddle," it's easy to simply place that leaf in the center of the frame. It's a way of hitting your viewer with cudgel that says, "look at this, [stupid]!" But once the viewer looks at the leaf, there's nowhere to go. Maybe the feather, but it's not much of a subject compared to that overpowering leaf in the dead center.
What I learned:
The geometric center of a photograph is the least important location. In fact, it's pretty universal that leaving the center empty is a good strategy. In the image at left, the three objects create a triangle that allows the eye to circle the scene. By doing so, it's much more interesting as a photograph. |
|